|
It is apparent that although the distance between successive horizontal planes increases gradually as these planes move downward (due to increased throw of the head), the areas, and hence the volumes, successively decrease. If we conceive the volume 0-1 as consisting of a mixture of rock and air-that is, containing a certain percentage of voids-then it is evident that when this volume has moved to position 18-19, the percentage of these voids will be considerably diminished. If it should happen that the voids have reached such a low proportion when the material drops from 17-18 to 18-19, that the closing stroke on 18-19 completely eliminates all voids, we have a choked condition at that point, a condition which is untenable because downward movement of the material ceases, and the crusher either stalls or fails at some point.
Clearly, there must be a maximum safe ratio between the volumes 0-1 and 18-19, a ratio which must depend upon the shape of the crushing chamber, the amount of head-movement, the percentage of voids in the feed, and upon the character of the feed, with particular reference to the manner in which it shatters in the crusher. The more fines there are in the feed, the less will be the percentage of voids, and the greater will be the chance of building up to a choked condition. This is especially true for high reduction ratios and close discharge settings; it is the reason why the careful crusher builder always cautions against feeding unscreened material to fine-reduction crushers. It is also understandable why it is advisable to use reduced throw eccentrics for settings below the manufacturer’s recommended minimums. If a condition of near-choke should exist just above the discharge level, a large movement of the head may be sufficient to complete the choke; whereas a smaller throw would not be so likely to "follow through" to that extent.
|